Event
Details
Date
November 2, 2005
Time
8:30 am - 5:00 pm
Location
Council Room
American Academy
of Arts and Sciences
Norton's Woods
Conference Center
Cambridge, MA
For
info please
contact
Heidi Knuff
|
|
Annual
Fall Panel Retreat
Agenda
| Readings for the Panel
| Recommended Readings | Questions
Agenda:
Program
on Emerging Technologies
Fall Multidisciplinary Panel Meeting
Redesigning
Nature?
Implications of Personalized Biotechnologies
Innovations
in synthetic biology and bioinformatics introduce the potential
for creating personalized biotechnologies such as gene therapy,
customized pharmaceuticals, and embryonic screening/selection/design.
These technologies can allow individuals to receive both
therapies and enhancements tailored to their genetic makeup
and personal preferences.
This
workshop will explore both the potential for personalized
biotechnologies and the broader societal implications of
such technologies with a focus on issues of equity and security.
| 8:30
am |
Continental
breakfast |
| 9:00
am |
Introductory
Presentations
| • |
Personalization
in information technologies, Frank Field |
| • |
Bioinformatics:
State of the art and emerging technologies, Scott
Mohr |
| • |
Synthetic
biology: State of the art and emerging technologies,
Drew Endy |
Overarching
Discussion Questions:
| • |
What
are the limits to prediction? |
| • |
What
are the sources/types of uncertainty? |
| • |
What
methods for adaptation (organizational, regulatory)
can reduce the impacts of uncertainties and emergent
properties? |
|
| 10:00
am |
Coffee
break |
| 10:20
am |
Panel
1: Personalization moderator –
Frank Field
Kieran
Downes, Intro
Scott
Mohr, Drew Endy, Tom Knight
Hanna
Breetz, Synthesis
Discussion Questions:
| • |
What
are the one or two most important near (<5
yrs.) and longer (5-10 yrs.) term innovations
in the area personalization? |
| • |
How
do emerging computing technologies impact the
development of personalization in biotech? |
| • |
What
do you see as the number one social issue arising
from personalized biotech and why? |
|
| 12:10
pm |
Lunch
|
| 1:10
pm |
Panel
2: Equity moderator – Dava Newman
Kate
Steel, Intro
Ken
Oye, Andrea Campbell
Sara
Wylie, Synthesis
Discussion Questions:
| • |
How
will personalized biotech affect international
and/or domestic equity? |
| • |
What
are the incentives/models (e.g. open source) that
can bridge the access gap? (e.g roles of private
sector, govt., non-profits) |
| • |
What
is equity when biotech is truly personalized? |
|
| 2:50
pm |
Coffee
break |
| 3:15
pm |
Panel
3: Security moderator – Ken Oye
Gautam
Mukunda, Intro
Rocco
Casagrande, Greg Koblentz
Mark
Avnet, Synthesis
Discussion Questions:
| • |
How
do you balance access (equity) to personalized
biotech with security? |
| • |
What
controls should be implemented to prevent accidental
release/mutation of personalized biotech? |
| • |
What
is the appropriate use of bioinformatics for security? |
|
| 4:30
pm |
Conclude
– Ken Oye |
>
back to top
Readings
for the Panel:
Big
Picture
Personalization
- 2005-04_atlantic_sandel_perfection.pdf:
Genetic breakthroughs put humans in a predicament, as
they may enable us to manipulate our own nature. Sandel
discusses four applications - muscles, memory, height,
and sex selection of children - and provides an ethical
case against such genetic enhancement. Sandel argues that
the problem with striving for genetic perfection is not
rooted in unfairness or the erosion of human agency (i.e.
problems with perfection per se), but in "the human
disposition that it expresses and promotes." By turning
our backs on an"openness to the unbidden," we
promote hubris, frenzied responsibility, and weakened
social solidarity.
- Fierz_2004.pdf:
Fierz's most original idea is his framing of six dimensions
(including disease evolution, environment, and genes)
that build a conceptualized space of personalized medicine.
The real benefit of this article, though, is that it provides
a broad introduction to personalized medicine. Fierz is
dazzled by its "magnificent" possibilities,
noting that it actually represents a re-personalization
after a century of one-size-fits-all pharamaceuticals.
Fierz discusses both the logistical challenges, especially
the need for lifelong electronic health records, and the
ethical or legal challenges, such as minority protection
("therapeutic orphans"), genetic privacy, and
discrimination, that face personalization of medicine.
- Personalized
drugs draw biotech dollars - USA Today, Oct 19, 2005
Equity
- EquitypanelArt.summaries.doc:
Equity Panel Article Summaries
- TailoredMedicineWhomWillitFitTheEthicsofPatientand
DiseaseStratification.pdf: Smart,
Andrew, Martin, Paul & Parker, Michael (2004). Tailored
Medicine: Whom Will it Fit? The Ethics of Patient and
Disease Stratification. Bioethics 18 (4), 322-343.
- Francis,
Leslie P., Battin, Margaret P., Jacobson, Jay A., Smith,
Charles B. & Botkin, Jeffrey (2005) How Infectious
Diseases Got Left Out - and What This Omission Might Have
Meant for Bioethics. Bioethics 19 (4), 307-322. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00445.x
- Open
Source Biology - Andrew Hessel http://www.mungbeing.com/issue_3.html?page=19&part=4
>
back to top
Recommended
Readings:
Security
- Biosecurity_Paper.pdf:
Taking the Measure of Countermeasures: Leaders' Views
on the Nation's Capacity to Develop Biodefense Countermeasures
- bioinformatics_and_security.pdf:
Microbiological Threats to Homeland Security: Problems
and Related Data That Must Be Considered in Planning a
Biodefense Strategy
Additional
Readings
- Van
Delden, Johannes, Bolt, Ineke, Kalis, Annemarie, Derijks,
Jeroen & Leufkens, Hubert (2004). Tailor-Made Pharmacotherapy:
Future Developments and Ethical Challenges in the Field
of Pharmacogenomics. Bioethics 18 (4), 303-321. doi:
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00399.x
- Daar_Singer_2005.pdf:
Daar and Singer offer an interesting first cut into personalized
biotech and equity across developed/developing nations.
Their key recommendation is that "for the forseeable
future, we should not focus on boutique 'personalized'
medicine, but on carefully defined differences between
populations and ethical ways of using emerging genomics
knowledge to develop drugs and improve health."
- President's
Council on Bioethics: Created during the Bush administration
and its publications seem to have a strong emphasis on
discussing alternatives to embryonic stem cell research
and justifying administration policy.
- Beyond
Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness.
The President's Council on Bioethics. Washington, D.C.,
October 2003. In particular, see Chapter
6.
>
back to top
Questions:
Overarching
Questions
- What
are the limits to prediction?
- What
are the sources/types of uncertainty?
- What
methods for adaptation (organizational, regulatory) can
reduce the impacts of uncertainties and emergent properties?
Personalization
- What
are the one or two most important near (<5 yrs.) and
longer (5-10 yrs.) term innovations in the area personalization?
- How
do emerging computing technologies impact the development
of personalization in biotech?
- What
do you see as the number one social issue arising from
personalized biotech and why?
Equity
- How
will personalized biotech affect international and/or
domestic equity?
- What
are the incentives/models (e.g. open source) that can
bridge the access gap? (e.g roles of private sector, govt.,
non-profits)
- What
is equity when biotech is truly personalized?
Security
- How
do you balance access (equity) to personalized biotech
with security?
- What
controls should be implemented to prevent accidental release/mutation
of personalized biotech?
- How
can emerging technologies, particularly the intersection
of biotech and information technology, be used to enhance
defenses and responses to bio-threats?
Summary
>
back to top |